Prime Minister Boris Johnson’s own ethics adviser has asked him to explain why he believes he has not broken the ministerial code after being fined for a lockdown breach.
Lord Geidt said there was a “legitimate question” over whether the code has been broken – which would normally mean a minister would have to resign.
“It may be that the prime minister considers that no such breach of his ministerial code has occurred. In that case, I believe a prime minister should respond accordingly, setting out his case in public,” he added.
Twenty-eight MPs now want Boris Johnson out immediately – follow latest updates
In an exchange of letters the prime minister replied that there was “no intent to break the [COVID] regulations”.
“I did not consider that the circumstances in which I received a fixed-penalty notice were contrary to the regulations,” Mr Johnson replied.
“I have accepted the outcome and paid it in compliance with legal requirements. Paying a fixed-penalty notice is not a criminal conviction.”
Lord Geidt said he had repeatedly told the prime minister to publicly explain why he thought incurring a fixed-penalty notice would not be in breach of the code of conduct for ministers, but said: “That advice has not been heeded.”
He said the prime minister had “made not a single public reference to the ministerial code”.
Lord Geidt also criticised the prime minister for refusing to give him the freedom to launch his own inquiries into possible breaches and said he would still need the prime minister’s consent before proceeding.
Last week, Mr Johnson was accused of watering down the ministerial code after the government said it was being updated to make clear that ministers will not necessarily have to resign for more minor violations.
Instead the prime minister will have the option of imposing lesser sanctions such as “some form of public apology, remedial action or removal of ministerial salary for a period”.
Labour’s deputy leader Angela Rayner said…
Source : skynews
