[ad_1]
Sir Keir Starmer will face accusations he misled the Commons over his appointment of Peter Mandelson if there is not “absolute consistency” between what he told MPs and government files, Harriet Harman has said.
The former Labour deputy leader’s comments on Sky’s Electoral Dysfunction podcast come after the government published documents detailing the vetting process undergone by Lord Mandelson when he was made US ambassador last year.
He was subsequently sacked over his friendship with paedophile Jeffrey Epstein.
Politics latest: Starmer facing questions after files released
Baroness Harman told Sky News politics editor Beth Rigby: “I’m sure the opposition will be looking at the documents to see whether or not there’s absolute consistency between what the prime minister said to the House of Commons and what’s in the documents, because if there’s not then it will raise the issue of misleading the House.”
The veteran Labour peer, who was deputy leader while Lord Mandelson was in Gordon Brown’s cabinet, led the parliamentary inquiry into whether Boris Johnson misled the House of Commons over the partygate scandal.
She was highly critical of Sir Keir’s decision to hand the ambassador job to Mandelson.
“Why on earth would you have any trust in somebody whose actions had already required them to be fired twice?” she said.
“The question is, how Keir Starmer could have gone ahead with that appointment when there was already more or less a prediction that there was going to be a problem?
“It was just inevitably going to go wrong, which of course it did.”
Baroness Harman said the evidence contained in the files published this week – and seen by the…
[ad_2]
