NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
Security experts are questioning the adequacy of the threat assessment carried out ahead of Charlie Kirk’s scheduled event at Utah Valley University on Wednesday, where the conservative activist was assassinated in front of thousands of attendees. The scrutiny comes as federal authorities end a manhunt for the suspect linked to the attack.
“Universities have so many speakers that come on campus all the time. Rarely do they plan for somebody taking a longer-range shot with a rifle,” explained retired Marine Lt. Col. Hal Kempfer in an interview with Fox News Digital.
WHAT KIRK’S ASSASSINATION MEANS FOR TRUMP’S SECURITY
“Sniper assassinations are far less common and even in active shooter scenarios, usually the active shooter gets into a closed space where the person is very close to where the victims are,” he said, noting the immense difficulty of defending against an assailant who can strike from a concealed, elevated, or distant position.
“It’s a lot more involved to carry out and plan for counter-sniper missions,” Kempfer said, emphasizing that this level of violence was never anticipated at what was meant to be a debate-style discussion.
An FBI agent looks near Utah Valley University where evidence was collected as authorities investigate the shooting of political activist Charlie Kirk on Sept. 11, 2025 in Orem, Utah. (Michael Ciaglo/Getty Images)
The revelation underscores an unprecedented challenge confronting law enforcement as they work to protect political rallies on college campuses and in communities nationwide.
“The campus has limited security. They don’t have an unlimited budget for this. They had six officers out there, which for any college campus security force, that’s not an insubstantial number of officers. But they also had 3,000 people at this event,” Kempfer said.
COMPLETE COVERAGE OF CHARLIE KIRK
Wednesday’s event, the first in what was supposed to be a series Turning Point USA’s “American…
