[ad_1]
The House of Lords has pushed the government’s Rwanda Bill back to the Commons again as a row continues over the controversial plan to “stop the boats”.
Prime Minister Rishi Sunak told reporters on Monday that “enough is enough”, promising the legislation would pass its final parliamentary stages this evening, “no matter how late it goes”.
But peers are now testing this pledge, insisting MPs take another look at one of the changes they want implemented to the bill – which aims to see asylum seekers making Channel crossings deported to the African nation – for the fifth time.
Politics live: Follow the latest from parliament as MPs and peers vote on Rwanda bill
Ministers made a concession earlier on Labour peer Lord Browne’s proposal that sought to ensure asylum seekers who had worked with British armed forces abroad were not deported – with the government promising to reassess all those from Afghanistan who claims had been rejected under the Afghan Relocations and Assistance Policy (ARAP) scheme.
Home Office minister Lord Sharpe told the chamber: “The government recognises the commitment and responsibility that comes with combat veterans, whether our own or those who have shared courage by serving alongside us, and we will not let them down.”
But there was no compromise on offer for Lord Hope’s amendment, which would require an independent body to rule Rwanda as a “safe country”, rather than just declaring it in law – and peers backed his call by 240 votes to 211.
Crossbencher Lord Anderson, who was representing his colleague in the debate, said: “In a less frenetic political environment, this common sense amendment or something very like it could, I am sure, have been hammered out between sensible people around a table.
“Sadly, that does not appear to be the world that we are in.”
The embattled bill will now head to the Commons where, due to the government’s majority, the peer’s proposal is likely to be rejected by MPs -…
[ad_2]
