[ad_1]
Angela Rayner has defended her decision to remove the need for “beautiful” buildings from Labour’s housing policy, claiming the word was “preventing and blocking development”.
The stipulation was added to planning rules by the previous Conservative government, with then housing secretary Michael Gove saying it would encourage communities to support new projects.
But his successor and now deputy prime minister said it was a “ridiculous” clause to include and there were already other rules and protections in place, adding: “I don’t buy this idea that I am just going to build a lot of ugly houses, that’s just not true.”
Politics live: Police deny Farage’s claims over Southport stabbings
Ms Rayner announced her shake-up of the planning system on Tuesday, including reinstating mandatory housing targets for England that had been scrapped by Mr Gove amid a backlash from Tory backbenchers.
She pledge to build 1.5 million new homes over the next five years and said new rules would require 50% of all new housing to be affordable.
However, she faced anger from shadow housing secretary Kemi Badenoch, who accused her of giving the go-ahead to build millions of “ugly homes”.
The Tory leadership hopeful added: “People deserve to live in beautiful homes and the fact that the Labour Party doesn’t care about that shows exactly how they are going to develop their policies.”
Asked about the criticism on BBC Radio 2, Ms Rayner said: “This is ridiculous. I mean, ‘beautiful’ is so subjective. But actually within the planning framework, there are a lot of specifications about in-keeping with the local area [already].
“It is about protecting nature and having access to nature, it is about making sure that buildings are safe, they are warm, they are sustainable.
“So…
[ad_2]
